Ticket #19 (closed defect: fixed)
Better usage of standard Trac tables to store metainformation
| Reported by: | lele | Owned by: | lele |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | major | Component: | darcs backend |
| Version: | Keywords: | ||
| Cc: |
Description
The issue I have is that all Darcs revisions are displayed as "missing" in grey and without the "title" attribute with the commit message since Trac+Darcs stores its revision information in a separate table. Trac expects to find the commit message in the "revision" table when it's formatting the changeset links here: http://trac.edgewall.org/browser/trunk/trac/versioncontrol/web_ui/changeset.py#L713
So, maybe instead of creating a separate table "darcs_revisions" it could use the "revision" table, and store the hashes separately, since that seems to be the only difference required for the "darcs_revisions" table.
-- Reported by Matt Good
Even if I do not understand where the revisions are displayed as "missing" in grey, I'll work on this soon.